03 February 2008

Why does there have to be a debate about Free Speech? Adler enunciates the truth perfectly so read it yourself.

People of different political persuasions should be debating about things like unions and taxes and whether or not Dion is a terrible leader and a pansy or just a terrible leader.

I suspect that the only reason "progressives" are going against unfettered speech is because they hate the people who are fighting speech laws. I also suspect that "progressives" are also scaredy cats who talk too much and suffer from reality-disconnect, but that is probably just my opinion.

The champion of speech suppression has already stooped to the lowest of the low. There's a big difference, Warren; children need protection. They are vulnerable. Politics, religion and race are a thinking game. Not a sick vice.

The truth is, "progressives" have zero faith in humanity. Why else do would they think that every teeny facet of our lives need to be controlled and regulated. Maybe, because in truth, they are the ones who are most like nazis. They are the racist ones, with their obsessions with white on coloured racism and their propensity to throw around racist accusations. They are the tyrants with their unwavering belief that the government can regulate our asses all the way to heaven on earth.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The truth is, "progressives" have zero faith in humanity.

What a lie. The truth is, progressives have zero faith in the opinion leaders of current conservatism...like the factually-challenged misery Charles Adler.

That rank-and-file conservatives and Conservatives switch off their brains and swallow whatever garbage these cretins feed them is just human nature. And as we all know, you'll start swallowing more sensible opinions once that becomes fashionable again.

That's the faith progressives have.

10/2/08 08:35  

Post a Comment

<< Home